↓ Skip to main content

False recognition of objects in visual scenes: Findings from a combined direct and indirect memory test

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
False recognition of objects in visual scenes: Findings from a combined direct and indirect memory test
Published in
Memory & Cognition, September 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13421-012-0242-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yana Weinstein, Robert A. Nash

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Japan 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 62%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#947
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,483
of 168,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.