↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention during vigilance

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention during vigilance
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 2009
DOI 10.3758/app.71.5.1042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine A. MacLean, Stephen R. Aichele, David A. Bridwell, George R. Mangun, Ewa Wojciulik, Clifford D. Saron

Abstract

The ability to remain vigilant over long periods of time is critical for many everyday tasks, but controlled studies of visual sustained attention show that performance declines over time when observers are required to respond to rare stimulus events (targets) occurring in a sequence of standard stimulus events (nontargets). When target discrimination is perceptually difficult, this vigilance decrement manifests as a decline in perceptual sensitivity. We examined whether sudden-onset stimuli could act as exogenous attentional cues to improve sensitivity during a traditional sustained attention task. Sudden-onset cues presented immediately before each stimulus attenuated the sensitivity decrement, but only when stimulus timing (the interstimulus interval [ISI]) was constant. When stimulus timing was variable, exogenous cues increased overall sensitivity but did not prevent performance decline. Finally, independent of the effects of sudden onsets, a constant ISI improved vigilance performance. Our results demonstrate that exogenous attention enhances perceptual sensitivity during vigilance performance, but that this effect is dependent on observers' being able to predict the timing of stimulus events. Such a result indicates a strong interaction between endogenous and exogenous attention during vigilance. We relate our findings to a resource model of vigilance, as well as to theories of endogenous and exogenous attention over short time periods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 188 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 20%
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 47%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#19,512,854
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#1,533
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,547
of 113,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.