↓ Skip to main content

Parks in Case of Disaster in Tokyo; Construction and Plan for Use of Rescue and Shelter

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parks in Case of Disaster in Tokyo; Construction and Plan for Use of Rescue and Shelter
Published in
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2003
DOI 10.5632/jila.66.208
Authors

Kenzo OGUCHI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,313,704
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#121
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,384
of 138,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.