↓ Skip to main content

Renal replacement therapies: physiological review

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Renal replacement therapies: physiological review
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1258-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Ronco, Zaccaria Ricci

Abstract

A physiological review on renal replacement therapies (RRT) is a challenging task: there is nothing "physiologic" about RRT, since the most accurate, safe and perfectly delivered extracorporeal therapy would still be far from "physiologically" replacing the function of the native kidney.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 127 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Postgraduate 18 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,174,175
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,679
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,117
of 87,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#34
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.