↓ Skip to main content

大学における研究関連求人の推移:JREC-IN Portal掲載の求人票に基づく分析

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大学における研究関連求人の推移:JREC-IN Portal掲載の求人票に基づく分析
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, September 2016
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.59.384
Authors

川島 浩誉, 山下 泰弘, 川井 千香子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,082,083
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#111
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,806
of 349,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.