↓ Skip to main content

Taking Full Responsibility: the Ethics of Supervision in Behavior Analytic Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Analysis in Practice, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Taking Full Responsibility: the Ethics of Supervision in Behavior Analytic Practice
Published in
Behavior Analysis in Practice, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40617-016-0144-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyra P. Sellers, Shahla Alai-Rosales, Rebecca P. F. MacDonald

Abstract

The supervision of professionals in the field of behavior analysis is multifaceted. The BACB® Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysis provides guidance for effective supervisory practices, as supervision impacts both the supervisee and the consumers. The purpose of this article is (1) to discuss rationales and consequences relative to supervision issues, (2) to provide directions for professional development in each of the seven identified supervisory areas within the code, and (3) to set the occasion for critical discourse relative to supervision. Case examples are used to illustrate each of the seven supervisory subcomponents of the "Behavior Analysts as Supervisors" section of the Code. A rationale is provided for each component, as well as a discussion of possible undesirable consequences resulting from not following the rule. While the code provides clear expectations of the desired behavior, this article explores more of the subtle nuances inherent in each section of the supervision code, with the goal of achieving a better understanding of the Code and enhancing supervisory skills.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 49%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 30 33%