You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facing growth in the European Nucleotide Archive
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nar/gks1175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guy Cochrane, Blaise Alako, Clara Amid, Lawrence Bower, Ana Cerdeño-Tárraga, Iain Cleland, Richard Gibson, Neil Goodgame, Mikyung Jang, Simon Kay, Rasko Leinonen, Xiu Lin, Rodrigo Lopez, Hamish McWilliam, Arnaud Oisel, Nima Pakseresht, Swapna Pallreddy, Youngmi Park, Sheila Plaister, Rajesh Radhakrishnan, Stephane Rivière, Marc Rossello, Alexander Senf, Nicole Silvester, Dmitriy Smirnov, Petra ten Hoopen, Ana Toribio, Daniel Vaughan, Vadim Zalunin |
| Abstract |
The European Nucleotide Archive (ENA; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/) collects, maintains and presents comprehensive nucleic acid sequence and related information as part of the permanent public scientific record. Here, we provide brief updates on ENA content developments and major service enhancements in 2012 and describe in more detail two important areas of development and policy that are driven by ongoing growth in sequencing technologies. First, we describe the ENA data warehouse, a resource for which we provide a programmatic entry point to integrated content across the breadth of ENA. Second, we detail our plans for the deployment of CRAM data compression technology in ENA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Peru | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Researcher | 20 | 27% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 42% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,671,559
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#7,230
of 26,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,995
of 277,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#98
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.