↓ Skip to main content

Cumulative evidence for MS as a neural network disconnection syndrome consistent with cognitive impairment mechanisms and the confounding role of fatigue and depression—outlook from the Fourth Nordic…

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cumulative evidence for MS as a neural network disconnection syndrome consistent with cognitive impairment mechanisms and the confounding role of fatigue and depression—outlook from the Fourth Nordic MS symposium
Published in
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, September 2016
DOI 10.1111/ane.12655
Pubmed ID
Authors

H van Ettinger-Veenstra

Abstract

The Fourth Nordic MS symposium served as a platform to present an overview over the rise and impact of cognitive impairment in people with MS, from early stages on, impairing their quality of life. After discussing MS and cognitive impairment symptoms, a review on the pathophysiology underlying cognitive impairment was given, followed by a talk on neuroimaging highlighting cortical reorganization in MS-affected brains. As a conclusion, therapy and treatment options were discussed. The symposium presented several cutting-edge research studies providing or testing working models that appear successful in predicting and explaining cognitive impairment in MS, such as the disconnection syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 21%
Psychology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
#1,978
of 2,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,501
of 348,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.