↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction Method for In Vivo Bioluminescence Tomography Based on the Split Bregman Iterative and Surrogate Functions

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Imaging and Biology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Reconstruction Method for In Vivo Bioluminescence Tomography Based on the Split Bregman Iterative and Surrogate Functions
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11307-016-1002-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuang Zhang, Kun Wang, Hongbo Liu, Chengcai Leng, Yuan Gao, Jie Tian

Abstract

Bioluminescence tomography (BLT) can provide in vivo three-dimensional (3D) images for quantitative analysis of biological processes in preclinical small animal studies, which is superior than the conventional planar bioluminescence imaging. However, to reconstruct light sources under the skin in 3D with desirable accuracy and efficiency, BLT has to face the ill-posed and ill-conditioned inverse problem. In this paper, we developed a new method for BLT reconstruction, which utilized the mathematical strategies of the split Bregman iterative and surrogate functions (SBISF) method. The proposed method considered the sparsity characteristic of the reconstructed sources. Thus, the sparsity itself was regarded as a kind of a priori information, and the sparse regularization is incorporated, which can accurately locate the position of the sources. Numerical simulation experiments of multisource cases with comparative analyses were performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Then, a bead-implanted mouse and a breast cancer xenograft mouse model were employed to validate the feasibility of this method in in vivo experiments. The results of both simulation and in vivo experiments indicated that comparing with the L1-norm iteration shrinkage method and non-monotone spectral projected gradient pursuit method, the proposed SBISF method provided the smallest position error with the least amount of time consumption. The SBISF method is able to achieve high accuracy and high efficiency in BLT reconstruction and hold great potential for making BLT more practical in small animal studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Computer Science 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#687
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,620
of 348,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.