| Title |
Cognitive Neuropsychology of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11065-009-9102-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven Paul Woods, David J. Moore, Erica Weber, Igor Grant |
| Abstract |
Advances in the treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have dramatically improved survival rates over the past 10 years, but HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain highly prevalent and continue to represent a significant public health problem. This review provides an update on the nature, extent, and diagnosis of HAND. Particular emphasis is placed on critically evaluating research within the realm of cognitive neuropsychology that aims to elucidate the component processes of HAND across the domains of executive functions, motor skills, speeded information processing, episodic memory, attention/working memory, language, and visuoperception. In addition to clarifying the cognitive mechanisms of HAND (e.g., impaired cognitive control), the cognitive neuropsychology approach may enhance the ecological validity of neuroAIDS research and inform the development of much needed novel, targeted cognitive and behavioral therapies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Zambia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 417 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 16% |
| Researcher | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 100 | 23% |
| Unknown | 72 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 144 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 32 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,584,696
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#213
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,889
of 100,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.