| Title |
Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-012-0700-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maren Gehrt, Stefan Wolfart, Nicole Rafai, Sven Reich, Daniel Edelhoff |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of anterior and posterior crowns made of a lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic framework material (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Oman | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 335 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 93 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 202 | 60% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 109 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,396,069
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#261
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,963
of 157,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.