↓ Skip to main content

Investigating Hypervigilance for Social Threat of Lonely Children

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Investigating Hypervigilance for Social Threat of Lonely Children
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10802-012-9676-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela Qualter, Ken Rotenberg, Louise Barrett, Peter Henzi, Alexandra Barlow, Maria Stylianou, Rebecca A. Harris

Abstract

The hypothesis that lonely children show hypervigilance for social threat was examined in a series of three studies that employed different methods including advanced eye-tracking technology. Hypervigilance for social threat was operationalized as hostility to ambiguously motivated social exclusion in a variation of the hostile attribution paradigm (Study 1), scores on the Children's Rejection-Sensitivity Questionnaire (Study 2), and visual attention to socially rejecting stimuli (Study 3). The participants were 185 children (11 years-7 months to 12 years-6 months), 248 children (9 years-4 months to 11 years-8 months) and 140 children (8 years-10 months to 12 years-10 months) in the three studies, respectively. Regression analyses showed that, with depressive symptoms covaried, there were quadratic relations between loneliness and these different measures of hypervigilance to social threat. As hypothesized, only children in the upper range of loneliness demonstrated elevated hostility to ambiguously motivated social exclusion, higher scores on the rejection sensitivity questionnaire, and disengagement difficulties when viewing socially rejecting stimuli. We found that very lonely children are hypersensitive to social threat.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 50%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,783,193
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,145
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,056
of 187,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.