↓ Skip to main content

Cloning, characterization and widespread expression analysis of testicular piRNA-like chicken RNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cloning, characterization and widespread expression analysis of testicular piRNA-like chicken RNAs
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11033-012-2295-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Zhang, Jianchao Li, Rong Chen, Aiqin Dai, Deqin Luan, Teng Ma, Dengke Hua, Guohong Chen, Guobin Chang

Abstract

Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are small RNAs abundant in the germline that have been implicated in germline development and maintenance of genomic integrity across several animal species including human, mouse, rat, zebrafish and drosophila. Tens of thousands of piRNAs have been discovered, yet abundant piRNAs have still not been detected in various eukaryotic organisms. This is a report on the characterization, cloning and expression profiling of piRNA-like chicken RNAs. Here, we identified 19 piRNAs, each 23-39 nucleotides long, from chicken testis using a small RNA cDNA library and T-A cloning methods. Three different pilRNAs were selected according to size, homology and secondary structure for temporal and spatial expression by Q-PCR technology in different tissues at five growth and four development stages of Chinese indigenous Rugao chickens (RG) and introduced recessive white feather chickens (RW). We found that, consistent to other organisms, pilRNA-encoding sequences within the chicken genome were asymmetrically distributed on the chromosomes while displaying a preference for intergenic regions across the genome. Interestingly, unlike miRNAs with unique stem-loop structures (mature miRNAs form stem section and the rest form loop section), distinct secondary structures of pilRNAs were predicted. In addition, chicken pilRNAs were not only abundant in the germline but also existed in somatic tissues, where, expression levels were influenced mainly by different pilRNAs, breed and gender. Taken together, our results suggest that two distinct secondary structures exist between pilRNAs and miRNAs, which may clarify the splicing and processing mechanisms of the two small RNAs are possible different. Moreover, our results suggest that pilRNAs may not only be confined to development and maintenance of the germline but may also play important roles in somatic tissues. Additionally, different pilRNAs may be involved in the unique regulatory machinery of complex biological processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 7%
Taiwan 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2012.
All research outputs
#18,321,703
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#1,594
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,698
of 276,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#33
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.