↓ Skip to main content

A Risk-Based Approach to Evaluating Wildlife Demographics for Management in a Changing Climate: A Case Study of the Lewis’s Woodpecker

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Risk-Based Approach to Evaluating Wildlife Demographics for Management in a Changing Climate: A Case Study of the Lewis’s Woodpecker
Published in
Environmental Management, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9953-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Towler, Victoria A. Saab, Richard S. Sojda, Katherine Dickinson, Cindy L. Bruyère, Karen R. Newlon

Abstract

Given the projected threat that climate change poses to biodiversity, the need for proactive response efforts is clear. However, integrating uncertain climate change information into conservation planning is challenging, and more explicit guidance is needed. To this end, this article provides a specific example of how a risk-based approach can be used to incorporate a species' response to climate into conservation decisions. This is shown by taking advantage of species' response (i.e., impact) models that have been developed for a well-studied bird species of conservation concern. Specifically, we examine the current and potential impact of climate on nest survival of the Lewis's Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) in two different habitats. To address climate uncertainty, climate scenarios are developed by manipulating historical weather observations to create ensembles (i.e., multiple sequences of daily weather) that reflect historical variability and potential climate change. These ensembles allow for a probabilistic evaluation of the risk posed to Lewis's Woodpecker nest survival and are used in two demographic analyses. First, the relative value of each habitat is compared in terms of nest survival, and second, the likelihood of exceeding a critical population threshold is examined. By embedding the analyses in a risk framework, we show how management choices can be made to be commensurate with a defined level of acceptable risk. The results can be used to inform habitat prioritization and are discussed in the context of an economic framework for evaluating trade-offs between management alternatives.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Indonesia 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Computer Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 19%