↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of CCNK/CDK12 is a druggable vulnerability of colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Degradation of CCNK/CDK12 is a druggable vulnerability of colorectal cancer
Published in
Cell Reports, July 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian M Dieter, Christine Siegl, Paula L Codó, Mario Huerta, Anna L Ostermann-Parucha, Erik Schulz, Martina K Zowada, Sylvia Martin, Karin Laaber, Ali Nowrouzi, Mona Blatter, Sina Kreth, Frank Westermann, Axel Benner, Ulrike Uhrig, Kerstin Putzker, Joe Lewis, Andrea Haegebarth, Dominik Mumberg, Simon J Holton, Joerg Weiske, Lena-Marit Toepper, Ulrike Scheib, Gerhard Siemeister, Claudia R Ball, Bernhard Kuster, Gabriele Stoehr, Hannes Hahne, Sarah Johannes, Martin Lange, Friederike Herbst, Hanno Glimm

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 39 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 24%
Chemistry 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 39 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,024,204
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#2,052
of 16,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,529
of 483,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#73
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.