↓ Skip to main content

New loci associated with birth weight identify genetic links between intrauterine growth and adult height and metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
284 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New loci associated with birth weight identify genetic links between intrauterine growth and adult height and metabolism
Published in
Nature Genetics, December 2012
DOI 10.1038/ng.2477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Momoko Horikoshi, Hanieh Yaghootkar, Dennis O Mook-Kanamori, Ulla Sovio, H Rob Taal, Branwen J Hennig, Jonathan P Bradfield, Beate St Pourcain, David M Evans, Pimphen Charoen, Marika Kaakinen, Diana L Cousminer, Terho Lehtimäki, Eskil Kreiner-Møller, Nicole M Warrington, Mariona Bustamante, Bjarke Feenstra, Diane J Berry, Elisabeth Thiering, Thiemo Pfab, Sheila J Barton, Beverley M Shields, Marjan Kerkhof, Elisabeth M van Leeuwen, Anthony J Fulford, Zoltán Kutalik, Jing Hua Zhao, Marcel den Hoed, Anubha Mahajan, Virpi Lindi, Liang-Kee Goh, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Ying Wu, Olli T Raitakari, Marie N Harder, Aline Meirhaeghe, Ioanna Ntalla, Rany M Salem, Karen A Jameson, Kaixin Zhou, Dorota M Monies, Vasiliki Lagou, Mirna Kirin, Jani Heikkinen, Linda S Adair, Fowzan S Alkuraya, Ali Al-Odaib, Philippe Amouyel, Ehm Astrid Andersson, Amanda J Bennett, Alexandra I F Blakemore, Jessica L Buxton, Jean Dallongeville, Shikta Das, Eco J C de Geus, Xavier Estivill, Claudia Flexeder, Philippe Froguel, Frank Geller, Keith M Godfrey, Frédéric Gottrand, Christopher J Groves, Torben Hansen, Joel N Hirschhorn, Albert Hofman, Mads V Hollegaard, David M Hougaard, Elina Hyppönen, Hazel M Inskip, Aaron Isaacs, Torben Jørgensen, Christina Kanaka-Gantenbein, John P Kemp, Wieland Kiess, Tuomas O Kilpeläinen, Norman Klopp, Bridget A Knight, Christopher W Kuzawa, George McMahon, John P Newnham, Harri Niinikoski, Ben A Oostra, Louise Pedersen, Dirkje S Postma, Susan M Ring, Fernando Rivadeneira, Neil R Robertson, Sylvain Sebert, Olli Simell, Torsten Slowinski, Carla M T Tiesler, Anke Tönjes, Allan Vaag, Jorma S Viikari, Jacqueline M Vink, Nadja Hawwa Vissing, Nicholas J Wareham, Gonneke Willemsen, Daniel R Witte, Haitao Zhang, Jianhua Zhao

Abstract

Birth weight within the normal range is associated with a variety of adult-onset diseases, but the mechanisms behind these associations are poorly understood. Previous genome-wide association studies of birth weight identified a variant in the ADCY5 gene associated both with birth weight and type 2 diabetes and a second variant, near CCNL1, with no obvious link to adult traits. In an expanded genome-wide association meta-analysis and follow-up study of birth weight (of up to 69,308 individuals of European descent from 43 studies), we have now extended the number of loci associated at genome-wide significance to 7, accounting for a similar proportion of variance as maternal smoking. Five of the loci are known to be associated with other phenotypes: ADCY5 and CDKAL1 with type 2 diabetes, ADRB1 with adult blood pressure and HMGA2 and LCORL with adult height. Our findings highlight genetic links between fetal growth and postnatal growth and metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 310 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 8%
Professor 24 7%
Student > Master 21 6%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 60 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 74 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 14%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 75 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,133,435
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,873
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,772
of 289,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#11
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.