↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of classical massage on stress perception and cortisol following primary treatment of breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The efficacy of classical massage on stress perception and cortisol following primary treatment of breast cancer
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00737-009-0143-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Listing, Michaela Krohn, Christiane Liezmann, Ina Kim, Anett Reisshauer, Eva Peters, Burghard F. Klapp, Martina Rauchfuss

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of classical massage on stress perception and mood disturbances, 34 women diagnosed with primary breast cancer were randomized into an intervention or control group. For a period of 5 weeks, the intervention group (n = 17) received biweekly 30-min classical massages. The control group (n = 17) received no additional treatment to their routine health care. The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Berlin Mood Questionnaire (BSF) were used and the patients' blood was collected at baseline (T1), at the end of the intervention period (T2), and 6 weeks after T2 (T3). Compared with control group, women in the intervention group reported significantly lower mood disturbances, especially for anger (p = 0.048), anxious depression (p = 0.03) at T2, and tiredness at T3 (p = 0.01). No group differences were found in PSQ scales, cortisol and serotonin concentrations at T2 and T3. However, perceived stress and cortisol serum levels (p = 0.03) were significantly reduced after massage therapy (T2) compared with baseline in the intervention group. Further research is needed to validate our findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 2 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 17%
Psychology 20 16%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,874,202
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#189
of 933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,419
of 94,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.