| Title |
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allison Tong, Kate Flemming, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Oliver, Jonathan Craig |
| Abstract |
The syntheses of multiple qualitative studies can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions. This study aims to develop a framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 26% |
| Australia | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 54% |
| Scientists | 15 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,995 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Virgin Islands, U.S. | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1956 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 351 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 319 | 16% |
| Researcher | 218 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 132 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 6% |
| Other | 401 | 20% |
| Unknown | 457 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 401 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 319 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 220 | 11% |
| Psychology | 177 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 57 | 3% |
| Other | 285 | 14% |
| Unknown | 536 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#769,142
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#59
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,403
of 288,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.