↓ Skip to main content

2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationAn update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationDeveloped with the special…

Overview of attention for article published in Europace, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationAn update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationDeveloped with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association
Published in
Europace, August 2012
DOI 10.1093/europace/eus305
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. John Camm, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Raffaele De Caterina, Irene Savelieva, Dan Atar, Stefan H. Hohnloser, Gerhard Hindricks, Paulus Kirchhof, Jeroen J. Bax, Helmut Baumgartner, Claudio Ceconi, Veronica Dean, Christi Deaton, Robert Fagard, Christian Funck-Brentano, David Hasdai, Arno Hoes, Paulus Kirchhof, Juhani Knuuti, Philippe Kolh, Theresa McDonagh, Cyril Moulin, Bogdan A. Popescu, Željko Reiner, Udo Sechtem, Per Anton Sirnes, Michal Tendera, Adam Torbicki, Alec Vahanian, Stephan Windecker, Panos Vardas, Nawwar Al-Attar, Ottavio Alfieri, Annalisa Angelini, Carina Blömstrom-Lundqvist, Paolo Colonna, Johan De Sutter, Sabine Ernst, Andreas Goette, Bulent Gorenek, Robert Hatala, Hein Heidbüchel, Magnus Heldal, Steen Dalby Kristensen, Philippe Kolh, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Hercules Mavrakis, Lluís Mont, Pasquale Perrone Filardi, Piotr Ponikowski, Bernard Prendergast, Frans H. Rutten, Ulrich Schotten, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, Freek W.A. Verheugt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Greece 3 <1%
Other 27 2%
Unknown 1040 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 206 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 13%
Other 140 13%
Student > Master 115 10%
Student > Postgraduate 86 8%
Other 301 27%
Unknown 123 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 768 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 3%
Engineering 19 2%
Computer Science 17 2%
Other 75 7%
Unknown 178 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,538,732
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#295
of 3,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,202
of 189,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.