↓ Skip to main content

Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-2-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S Thompson, Carole A Estabrooks, Shannon Scott-Findlay, Katherine Moore, Lars Wallin

Abstract

There has been considerable interest recently in developing and evaluating interventions to increase research use by clinicians. However, most work has focused on medical practices; and nursing is not well represented in existing systematic reviews. The purpose of this article is to report findings from a systematic review of interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 91 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Social Sciences 16 16%
Psychology 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,372,313
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,411
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,505
of 71,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them