You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109256 |
| Authors |
Andrew Balmford, Richard B. Bradbury, Jan M. Bauer, Steven Broad, Gayle Burgess, Mark Burgman, Hilary Byerly, Susan Clayton, Dulce Espelosin, Paul J. Ferraro, Brendan Fisher, Emma E. Garnett, Julia P.G. Jones, Theresa M. Marteau, Mark Otieno, Stephen Polasky, Taylor H. Ricketts, Chris Sandbrook, Kira Sullivan-Wiley, Rosie Trevelyan, Sander van der Linden, Diogo Veríssimo, Kristian Steensen Nielsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 25% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Japan | 6 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 70% |
| Scientists | 27 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 76 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#756,930
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#647
of 6,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,101
of 434,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#22
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.