↓ Skip to main content

Repeating caldera collapse events constrain fault friction at the kilometer scale

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeating caldera collapse events constrain fault friction at the kilometer scale
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2021
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2101469118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Segall, Kyle Anderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 39%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 48%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#940,374
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14,762
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,148
of 427,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#310
of 944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.