↓ Skip to main content

Familial Intracranial Aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Familial Intracranial Aneurysms
Published in
Stroke, November 2012
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.112.667261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Mackey, Robert D. Brown, Charles J. Moomaw, Richard Hornung, Laura Sauerbeck, Daniel Woo, Tatiana Foroud, Dheeraj Gandhi, Dawn Kleindorfer, Matthew L. Flaherty, Irene Meissner, Craig Anderson, Guy Rouleau, E. Sander Connolly, Ranjan Deka, Daniel L. Koller, Todd Abruzzo, John Huston, Joseph P. Broderick

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that family members with intracranial aneurysms (IAs) often harbor IAs in similar anatomic locations. IA location is important because of its association with rupture. We tested the hypothesis that anatomic susceptibility to IA location exists using a family-based IA study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Finland 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#9,429
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,944
of 285,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#62
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.