↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic primitives of motor behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic primitives of motor behavior
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00422-012-0527-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neville Hogan, Dagmar Sternad

Abstract

We present in outline a theory of sensorimotor control based on dynamic primitives, which we define as attractors. To account for the broad class of human interactive behaviors-especially tool use-we propose three distinct primitives: submovements, oscillations, and mechanical impedances, the latter necessary for interaction with objects. Owing to the fundamental features of the neuromuscular system-most notably, its slow response-we argue that encoding in terms of parameterized primitives may be an essential simplification required for learning, performance, and retention of complex skills. Primitives may simultaneously and sequentially be combined to produce observable forces and motions. This may be achieved by defining a virtual trajectory composed of submovements and/or oscillations interacting with impedances. Identifying primitives requires care: in principle, overlapping submovements would be sufficient to compose all observed movements but biological evidence shows that oscillations are a distinct primitive. Conversely, we suggest that kinematic synergies, frequently discussed as primitives of complex actions, may be an emergent consequence of neuromuscular impedance. To illustrate how these dynamic primitives may account for complex actions, we briefly review three types of interactive behaviors: constrained motion, impact tasks, and manipulation of dynamic objects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 268 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 26%
Researcher 53 19%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Professor 14 5%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 111 39%
Neuroscience 31 11%
Computer Science 23 8%
Psychology 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 45 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,763,141
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#68
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,271
of 183,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them