Title |
Structured medication reviews: origins, implementation, evidence, and prospects
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp21x716465 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Duncan Stewart, Mary Madden, Paul Davies, Cate Whittlesea, Jim McCambridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 41% |
Spain | 2 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Guinea | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
Scientists | 4 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 27% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,600,020
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#778
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,021
of 443,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#22
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.