↓ Skip to main content

Pathology and Pathogenesis of Fatal Bordetella pertussis Infection in Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathology and Pathogenesis of Fatal Bordetella pertussis Infection in Infants
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2008
DOI 10.1086/589753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher D. Paddock, Gary N. Sanden, James D. Cherry, Anthony A. Gal, Claire Langston, Kathleen M. Tatti, Kai-Hui Wu, Cynthia S. Goldsmith, Patricia W. Greer, Jeltley L. Montague, Mark T. Eliason, Robert C. Holman, Jeannette Guarner, Wun-Ju Shieh, Sherif R. Zaki

Abstract

Each year, Bordetella pertussis infection causes an estimated 294,000 deaths worldwide, primarily among young, nonvaccinated children. Approximately 90% of all deaths due to pertussis in the Unites States occur in young infants. These children often develop intractable pulmonary hypertension; however, the pathophysiologic mechanism responsible for this complication has not been well characterized, and there have been no detailed descriptions of the pathology of this disease since the 1940s.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 210 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 21 10%
Other 17 8%
Other 47 22%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 34 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,790,980
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#8,300
of 16,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,747
of 98,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#46
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.