| Title |
Estimating Risk in Medicare Patients With THA: An Electronic Risk Calculator for Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2605-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin J. Bozic, Kevin Ong, Edmund Lau, Daniel J. Berry, Thomas P. Vail, Steven M. Kurtz, Harry E. Rubash |
| Abstract |
Although risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and mortality after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been identified, interactions between specific patient risk factors are poorly understood. Therefore, it is difficult for surgeons to counsel patients on their individual risk of PJI or mortality after THA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 44% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,334
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,121
of 285,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#123
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.