↓ Skip to main content

Anti-influenza virus activity of Ginkgo biloba leaf extracts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Natural Medicines, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Anti-influenza virus activity of Ginkgo biloba leaf extracts
Published in
Journal of Natural Medicines, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11418-012-0725-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahiro Haruyama, Kyosuke Nagata

Abstract

We examined the influence of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract (EGb) on the infectivity of influenza viruses in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Plaque assays demonstrated that multiplication of influenza viruses after adsorption to host cells was not affected in the agarose overlay containing EGb. However, when the viruses were treated with EGb before exposure to cells, their infectivity was markedly reduced. In contrast, the inhibitory effect was not observed when MDCK cells were treated with EGb before infection with influenza viruses. Hemagglutination inhibition assays revealed that EGb interferes with the interaction between influenza viruses and erythrocytes. The inhibitory effect of EGb was observed against influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2) and influenza B viruses. These results suggest that EGb contains an anti-influenza virus substance(s) that directly affects influenza virus particles and disrupts the function of hemagglutinin in adsorption to host cells. In addition to the finding of the anti-influenza virus activity of EGb, our results demonstrated interesting and important insights into the screening system for anti-influenza virus activity. In general, the plaque assay using drug-containing agarose overlays is one of the most reliable methods for detection of antiviral activity. However, our results showed that EGb had no effects either on the number of plaques or on their sizes in the plaque assay. These findings suggest the existence of inhibitory activities against the influenza virus that were overlooked in past studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 23%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,036,546
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#206
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,206
of 287,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.