↓ Skip to main content

Serum CD163 and TARC as Disease Response Biomarkers in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum CD163 and TARC as Disease Response Biomarkers in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberley Jones, Frank Vari, Colm Keane, Pauline Crooks, Jamie P. Nourse, Louise A. Seymour, David Gottlieb, David Ritchie, Devinder Gill, Maher K. Gandhi

Abstract

Candidate circulating disease response biomarkers for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) might arise from Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells or nonmalignant tumor-infiltrating cells. HRS cells are sparse within the diseased node, whereas benign CD163(+) M2 tissue-associated macrophages (TAM) are prominent. CD163(+) cells within the malignant node may be prognostic, but there is no data on serum CD163 (sCD163). The HRS-specific serum protein sTARC shows promise as a disease response biomarker. Tumor-specific and tumor-infiltrating circulating biomarkers have not been compared previously.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,010,002
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#5,613
of 12,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,170
of 282,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#51
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.