You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective Comparison of Valve Regurgitation Quantitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circimaging.112.975623 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J. Cawley, Christian Hamilton-Craig, David S. Owens, Eric V. Krieger, Wendy E. Strugnell, Lee Mitsumori, Caryn L. D’Jang, Rebecca G. Schwaegler, Khanh Q. Nguyen, Bianca Nguyen, Jeffrey H. Maki, Catherine M. Otto |
| Abstract |
Both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allow quantification of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR). We hypothesized that CMR measurement of regurgitant volume (RVol) is more reproducible than TTE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 56% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
#681
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,545
of 286,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.