↓ Skip to main content

U.S. drinking water challenges in the twenty-first century.

Overview of attention for article published in EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
U.S. drinking water challenges in the twenty-first century.
Published in
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, February 2002
DOI 10.1289/ehp.02110s143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronnie B Levin, Paul R Epstein, Tim E Ford, Winston Harrington, Erik Olson, Eric G Reichard

Abstract

The access of almost all 270 million U.S. residents to reliable, safe drinking water distinguishes the United States in the twentieth century from that of the nineteenth century. The United States is a relatively water-abundant country with moderate population growth; nonetheless, current trends are sufficient to strain water resources over time, especially on a regional basis. We have examined the areas of public water infrastructure, global climate effects, waterborne disease (including emerging and resurging pathogens), land use, groundwater, surface water, and the U.S. regulatory history and its horizon. These issues are integrally interrelated and cross all levels of public and private jurisdictions. We conclude that U.S. public drinking water supplies will face challenges in these areas in the next century and that solutions to at least some of them will require institutional changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Spain 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 178 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Professor 10 5%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 40 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Engineering 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,213,966
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#3,374
of 8,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,679
of 134,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.