You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental evaluation of spatial capture–recapture study design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eap.2419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill Fleming, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Sean C. Sterrett, Chris Sutherland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 28% |
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,400,149
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#369
of 3,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,562
of 421,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#15
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.