↓ Skip to main content

A typology of drought decision making: Synthesizing across cases to understand drought preparedness and response actions

Overview of attention for article published in Weather and Climate Extremes, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A typology of drought decision making: Synthesizing across cases to understand drought preparedness and response actions
Published in
Weather and Climate Extremes, September 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100362
Authors

Amanda E. Cravens, Jen Henderson, Jack Friedman, Nina Burkardt, Ashley E. Cooper, Tonya Haigh, Michael Hayes, Jamie McEvoy, Stephanie Paladino, Adam K. Wilke, Hailey Wilmer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 37 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 17%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 39 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,385,251
of 24,160,198 outputs
Outputs from Weather and Climate Extremes
#285
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,856
of 419,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Weather and Climate Extremes
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,160,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.