↓ Skip to main content

Mendelian randomisation study of smoking exposure in relation to breast cancer risk

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mendelian randomisation study of smoking exposure in relation to breast cancer risk
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, August 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41416-021-01432-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanla A. Park, Sonja Neumeyer, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia N. Antonenkova, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Annelie Augustinsson, Adinda Baten, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Sara Y. Brucker, Barbara Burwinkel, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E. Castelao, Stephen J. Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Christine L. Clarke, Don M. Conroy, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, A. Heather Eliassen, Christoph Engel, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Henrik Flyger, Lin Fritschi, Montserrat García-Closas, José A. García-Sáenz, Mia M. Gaudet, Graham G. Giles, Gord Glendon, Mark S. Goldberg, David E. Goldgar, Anna González-Neira, Mervi Grip, Pascal Guénel, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Sileny Han, Elaine F. Harkness, Steven N. Hart, Wei He, Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen, John L. Hopper, David J. Hunter, Agnes Jager, Anna Jakubowska, Esther M. John, Audrey Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Pooja Middha Kapoor, Renske Keeman, Elza Khusnutdinova, Cari M. Kitahara, Linetta B. Koppert, Stella Koutros, Vessela N. Kristensen, Allison W. Kurian, James Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Wing-Yee Lo, Jan Lubiński, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Alfons Meindl, Usha Menon, Roger L. Milne, Taru A. Muranen, Heli Nevanlinna, William G. Newman, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Kenneth Offit, Andrew F. Olshan, Håkan Olsson, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Paolo Peterlongo, Julian Peto, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Nadege Presneau, Paolo Radice, Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Atocha Romero, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Lukas Schwentner, Christopher Scott, Mitul Shah, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jacques Simard, Ann Smeets, Melissa C. Southey, John J. Spinelli, Victoria Stevens, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rulla M. Tamimi, William J. Tapper, Jack A. Taylor, Mary Beth Terry, Ian Tomlinson, Melissa A. Troester, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Elke M. van Veen, Joseph Vijai, Sophia Wang, Camilla Wendt, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Argyrios Ziogas, Alison M. Dunning, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Douglas F. Easton, Wei Zheng, Peter Kraft, Jenny Chang-Claude

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 54 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 54 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,055,192
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#9,155
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,287
of 442,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#47
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.