↓ Skip to main content

The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life in lung cancer patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
Title
The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life in lung cancer patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haryana M Dhillon, Hidde P van der Ploeg, Melanie L Bell, Michael Boyer, Stephen Clarke, Janette Vardy

Abstract

People with lung cancer have substantial symptom burden and more unmet needs than the general cancer population. Physical activity (PA) has been shown to positively influence quality of life (QOL), fatigue and daily functioning in the curative treatment of people with breast and colorectal cancers and lung diseases, as well as in palliative settings. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine if lung cancer patients benefit from structured PA intervention. The Physical Activity in Lung Cancer (PAL) trial is designed to evaluate the impact of a 2-month PA intervention on fatigue and QOL in patients with non-resectable lung cancer. Biological mechanisms will also be studied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 307 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 18%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 85 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 14%
Psychology 28 9%
Sports and Recreations 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 100 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,613,720
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,616
of 8,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,486
of 277,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#53
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.