You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Secular Trends in Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Increase the Total Burden of Infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1093/cid/cis1006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
H. S. M. Ammerlaan, S. Harbarth, A. G. M. Buiting, D. W. Crook, F. Fitzpatrick, H. Hanberger, L. A. Herwaldt, P. H. J. van Keulen, J. A. J. W. Kluytmans, A. Kola, R. S. Kuchenbecker, E. Lingaas, N. Meessen, M. M. Morris-Downes, J. M. Pottinger, P. Rohner, R. P. dos Santos, H. Seifert, H. Wisplinghoff, S. Ziesing, A. S. Walker, M. J. M. Bonten |
Abstract |
It is unknown whether rising incidence rates of nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) replace antibiotic-susceptible bacteria (ASB), leaving the total BSI rate unaffected. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
Researcher | 22 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 20% |
Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,277,664
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#3,862
of 16,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,285
of 287,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#19
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.