↓ Skip to main content

The Developmental Basis of Quantitative Craniofacial Variation in Humans and Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
The Developmental Basis of Quantitative Craniofacial Variation in Humans and Mice
Published in
Evolutionary Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11692-012-9210-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neus Martínez-Abadías, Philipp Mitteroecker, Trish E. Parsons, Mireia Esparza, Torstein Sjøvold, Campbell Rolian, Joan T. Richtsmeier, Benedikt Hallgrímsson

Abstract

The human skull is a complex and highly integrated structure that has long held the fascination of anthropologists and evolutionary biologists. Recent studies of the genetics of craniofacial variation reveal a very complex and multifactorial picture. These findings contrast with older ideas that posit much simpler developmental bases for variation in cranial morphology such as the growth of the brain or the growth of the chondrocranium relative to the dermatocranium. Such processes have been shown to have major effects on cranial morphology in mice. It is not known, however, whether they are relevant to explaining normal phenotypic variation in humans. To answer this question, we obtained vectors of shape change from mutant mouse models in which the developmental basis for the craniofacial phenotype is known to varying degrees, and compared these to a homologous dataset constructed from human crania obtained from a single population with a known genealogy. Our results show that the shape vectors associated with perturbations to chondrocranial growth, brain growth, and body size in mice do largely correspond to axes of covariation in humans. This finding supports the view that the developmental basis for craniofacial variation funnels down to a relatively small number of key developmental processes that are similar across mice and humans. Understanding these processes and how they influence craniofacial shape provides fundamental insights into the developmental basis for evolutionary change in the human skull as well as the developmental-genetic basis for normal phenotypic variation in craniofacial form.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,176,348
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#294
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,541
of 275,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.