↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Glidescope® and Pentax AWS®laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the Glidescope® and Pentax AWS®laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-9-9
Authors

Sajid Nasim, Chrisen H Maharaj, Muhammad A Malik, John O' Donnell, Brendan D Higgins, John G Laffey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#3,659,183
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#171
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,393
of 92,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them