↓ Skip to main content

The role of the invasive, placental trophoblast in human pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
The role of the invasive, placental trophoblast in human pregnancy
Published in
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10354-012-0071-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jürgen Pollheimer, Martin Knöfler

Abstract

During early pregnancy the placenta-derived extravillous trophoblast starts to invade the maternal uterus in order to regulate adequate blood flow and nutrient supply to the growing fetus. A unique set of events including plugging and remodelling of maternal vessels, regulation of oxygen levels, as well as the crosstalk with maternal decidual cells are thought to be precisely controlled by the invading extravillous trophoblasts. However, defects in these processes can lead to severe complications during pregnancy threatening the well-being of both the mother and the developing fetus. For instance incomplete trophoblast-associated invasion and arterial remodelling are associated with preeclampsia, the most common pregnancy-related complication. Moreover, failure in proper placental development and adequate fetal nutrition could be effective later in life, as growth-restricted neonates have a higher risk to develop adult onset of hypertension, heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Consequently, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms that underlie trophoblast invasion is thought to improve both diagnosis and treatment of various pregnancy-related disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,843,569
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#222
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,599
of 165,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.