You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Energy-Gap Opening in a Bi(110) Nanoribbon Induced by Edge Reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.109.246804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jia-Tao Sun, Han Huang, Swee Liang Wong, H.-J. Gao, Yuan Ping Feng, Andrew Thye Shen Wee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 33 | 49% |
| Materials Science | 16 | 24% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#3,881,507
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#10,022
of 35,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,522
of 278,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#147
of 710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.