↓ Skip to main content

Hazardous cosleeping environments and risk factors amenable to change: case-control study of SIDS in south west England

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hazardous cosleeping environments and risk factors amenable to change: case-control study of SIDS in south west England
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2009
DOI 10.1136/bmj.b3666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter S Blair, Peter Sidebotham, Carol Evason-Coombe, Margaret Edmonds, Ellen M A Heckstall-Smith, Peter Fleming

Abstract

To investigate the factors associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) from birth to age 2 years, whether recent advice has been followed, whether any new risk factors have emerged, and the specific circumstances in which SIDS occurs while cosleeping (infant sharing the same bed or sofa with an adult or child).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Other 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 14%
Psychology 14 9%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#725,429
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#7,874
of 64,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,762
of 105,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#12
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.