| Title |
Addition of telephone coaching to a physiotherapist-delivered physical activity program in people with knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-246 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim L Bennell, Thorlene Egerton, Caroline Bills, Janette Gale, Gregory S Kolt, Stephen J Bunker, David J Hunter, Caroline A Brand, Andrew Forbes, Anthony Harris, Rana S Hinman |
| Abstract |
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common and costly chronic musculoskeletal conditions world-wide and is associated with substantial pain and disability. Many people with knee OA also experience co-morbidities that further add to the OA burden. Uptake of and adherence to physical activity recommendations is suboptimal in this patient population, leading to poorer OA outcomes and greater impact of associated co-morbidities. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will investigate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of adding telephone coaching to a physiotherapist-delivered physical activity intervention for people with knee OA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 422 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 17% |
| Unknown | 116 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 68 | 16% |
| Psychology | 34 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 133 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,713,139
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,935
of 4,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,936
of 287,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#34
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.