↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Liposome Bupivacaine Injection Following a Single Administration at the Surgical Site

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Drug Investigation, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 959)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
10 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Liposome Bupivacaine Injection Following a Single Administration at the Surgical Site
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s40261-012-0043-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

DeeDee Hu, Erol Onel, Neil Singla, William G. Kramer, Admir Hadzic

Abstract

Local anaesthetics are often used as part of multimodal pain management techniques to manage postsurgical pain and lessen the need for opioid analgesics; however, the duration of action of traditional formulations of local anaesthetics is short. Liposome bupivacaine is a novel, multivesicular formulation designed for rapid absorption, prolonged release of bupivacaine, and analgesia following a single intra-operative administration into the surgical wound. This article provides a summary of the pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine compared with bupivacaine HCl based on data compiled from four randomized, active- and placebo-controlled trials that included pharmacokinetic assessments following single administrations of study drug. Each study evaluated the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine in separate surgical populations (patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, total knee arthroplasty, haemorrhoidectomy or bunionectomy). Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)), area under the curve (AUC) for plasma bupivacaine concentration over time extrapolated to infinity (AUC(∞)), time to observed C(max) (t(max)) and terminal elimination half-life of bupivacaine (t(½)). The studies assessed single administrations of liposome bupivacaine at dose levels ranging from 106 to 532 mg or bupivacaine HCl 100 to 150 mg or placebo (0.9 % sodium chloride) given locally via wound infiltration at the end of surgery prior to wound closure. Male and non-pregnant female patients (n = 253) aged ≥18 years, scheduled to undergo surgery as per the specific protocol for each study, were enrolled. Patient characteristics were stratified by liposome bupivacaine doses ≤266 mg and >266 mg, and bupivacaine HCl treatment arms. Pharmacokinetic parameters for liposome bupivacaine doses of 106, 266, 399 and 532 mg were compared. Plasma concentration versus time profiles were quantitatively similar across these four dose levels of liposome bupivacaine, with an initial peak occurring within 1 h after administration followed by a second peak about 12-36 h later. The overall incidence of adverse events was lower in the liposome bupivacaine ≤266-mg group than the liposome bupivacaine >266-mg and bupivacaine HCl groups (100- or 150-mg doses). In summary, liposome bupivacaine was well tolerated across the four studies and varied surgical models, and exhibited bimodal kinetics with rapid uptake observed during the first few hours and prolonged release through 96 h after administration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Other 18 14%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Chemistry 4 3%
Materials Science 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,268,027
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#42
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,109
of 278,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.