↓ Skip to main content

Celiac Disease: A Challenging Disease for Pharmaceutical Scientists

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Celiac Disease: A Challenging Disease for Pharmaceutical Scientists
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11095-012-0951-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Matoori, Gregor Fuhrmann, Jean-Christophe Leroux

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated enteropathy triggered by the ingestion of gluten-containing grains that affects ~1% of the white ethnic population. In the last decades, a rise in prevalence of CD has been observed that cannot be fully explained by improved diagnostics. Genetic predisposition greatly influences the susceptibility of individuals towards CD, though environmental factors also play a role. With no pharmacological treatments available, the only option to keep CD in remission is a strict and permanent exclusion of dietary gluten. Such a gluten-free diet is difficult to maintain because of gluten's omnipresence in food (e.g., additive in processed food). The development of adjuvant therapies which would permit the intake of small amounts of gluten would be desirable to improve the quality of life of patients on a gluten-free diet. Such therapies include gluten-degrading enzymes, polymeric binders, desensitizing vaccines, anti-inflammatory drugs, transglutaminase 2 inhibitors, and HLA-DQ2 blockers. However, many of these approaches pose pharmaceutical challenges with respect to drug formulation and stability, or application route and dosing interval. This perspective article discusses how pharmaceutical scientists may deal with these challenges and contribute to the implementation of novel therapeutic options for patients with CD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Postgraduate 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,808,527
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#976
of 3,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,875
of 287,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.