↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of social prescribing to reduce frequent attender consultation rates in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of social prescribing to reduce frequent attender consultation rates in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x703109
Authors

Adam Jeyes, Laura Pugh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,889,142
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,577
of 4,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,451
of 353,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#44
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.