↓ Skip to main content

Replacement of administration sets (including transducers) for peripheral arterial catheters: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replacement of administration sets (including transducers) for peripheral arterial catheters: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04346.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Azlina Daud, Claire Rickard, Marie Cooke, Heather Reynolds

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review of the evidence for the optimal interval for replacement of administration sets for peripheral arterial catheters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 9 27%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2012.
All research outputs
#16,246,570
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#3,873
of 5,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,489
of 289,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#36
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.