↓ Skip to main content

Explanations for social inequalities in preterm delivery in the prospective Lifeways cohort in the Republic of Ireland

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Public Health, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Explanations for social inequalities in preterm delivery in the prospective Lifeways cohort in the Republic of Ireland
Published in
European Journal of Public Health, July 2011
DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckr089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Niedhammer, Celine Murrin, Deirdre O’Mahony, Sean Daly, John J. Morrison, Cecily C. Kelleher

Abstract

Social inequalities in pregnancy outcomes have been extensively described but studies that explain these inequalities comprehensively are lacking. This analysis evaluated the contribution of material, psychosocial, behavioural, nutritional and obstetrical factors in explaining social inequalities in preterm delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Unspecified 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,739,362
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Public Health
#1,000
of 3,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,691
of 117,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Public Health
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.