You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of germline genetic variants with breast cancer-specific survival in patient subgroups defined by clinic-pathological variables related to tumor biology and type of systemic treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13058-021-01450-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Morra, Maria Escala-Garcia, Jonathan Beesley, Renske Keeman, Sander Canisius, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Paul L. Auer, Annelie Augustinsson, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Hermann Brenner, Thomas Brüning, Saundra S. Buys, Bette Caan, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E. Castelao, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Ting-Yuan David Cheng, Christine L. Clarke, Sarah V. Colonna, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Joe Dennis, Thilo Dörk, Laure Dossus, Alison M. Dunning, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, Arif B. Ekici, A. Heather Eliassen, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Henrik Flyger, Lin Fritschi, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, José A. García-Sáenz, Graham G. Giles, Mervi Grip, Pascal Guénel, Melanie Gündert, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Steven N. Hart, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Arndt Hartmann, Wei He, Maartje J. Hooning, Reiner Hoppe, John L. Hopper, Anthony Howell, David J. Hunter, Agnes Jager, Anna Jakubowska, Wolfgang Janni, Esther M. John, Audrey Y. Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Machteld Keupers, Cari M. Kitahara, Stella Koutros, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, Allison W. Kurian, James V. Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Martha Linet, Robert N. Luben, Jan Lubiński, Michael Lush, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, John W. M. Martens, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Roger L. Milne, Anna Marie Mulligan, Taru A. Muranen, Heli Nevanlinna, William G. Newman, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Andrew F. Olshan, Håkan Olsson, Nick Orr, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Alpa V. Patel, Bernard Peissel, Paolo Peterlongo, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Karolina Prajzendanc, Ross Prentice, Nadege Presneau, Brigitte Rack, Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Valerie Rhenius, Atocha Romero, Rebecca Roylance, Matthias Ruebner, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Rita K. Schmutzler, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christopher Scott, Mitul Shah, Snezhana Smichkoska, Melissa C. Southey, Jennifer Stone, Harald Surowy, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rulla M. Tamimi, William J. Tapper, Lauren R. Teras, Mary Beth Terry, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Ian Tomlinson, Melissa A. Troester, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Qin Wang, Amber N. Hurson, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Argyrios Ziogas, Hiltrud Brauch, Montserrat García-Closas, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Marjanka K. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,328
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,528
of 439,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.