| Title |
Signatures of demographic bottlenecks in European wolf populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-010-0177-6 |
| Authors |
Natalia Sastre, Carles Vilà, María Salinas, Vladimir V. Bologov, Vicente Urios, Armand Sánchez, Olga Francino, Oscar Ramírez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 218 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 62 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 150 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,137,142
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#409
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,999
of 193,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.