↓ Skip to main content

Consistent proportional macronutrient intake selected by adult domestic cats (Felis catus) despite variations in macronutrient and moisture content of foods offered

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Consistent proportional macronutrient intake selected by adult domestic cats (Felis catus) despite variations in macronutrient and moisture content of foods offered
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00360-012-0727-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian K. Hewson-Hughes, Victoria L. Hewson-Hughes, Alison Colyer, Andrew T. Miller, Simon R. Hall, David Raubenheimer, Stephen J. Simpson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Researcher 11 14%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,973,254
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#172
of 850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,245
of 291,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.